Free entry when you enter by 25 April 25

To register and start your entry, please use the button below.

We would advise completing your entry in Word or a similar programme first before copying and pasting into the entry form.

If you need help with your entry or require any clarification, please contact Sara Sane on 020 3953 2819 or email sara.sane@emap.com .

Enter by 25 April 2025 for free . Entries after this date cost £399 and the final entry deadline for the British Construction & Infrastructure Awards is 09 May 2025. The winners will be announced at the JW Marriott Grosvenor House Hotel, London on 08 October 2025.

Special Award 

Endorsed by Sir John Armitt, this prize is awarded to projects that successfully exceed their objectives, deliver a satisfied client and create meaningful benefits for end-users and broader stakeholders. Exemplifying the very best of what the industry is capable of, winners will represent excellence across multiple aspects of the project and will stand as an example of what projects can aspire to achieve.
£ 0.00
You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Judges will be scoring your entry against these three key criteria:

  • Evidence of client satisfaction, including achievement against cost, time, and quality benchmarks.
  • Specific improvements in service performance directly attributable to the project and detail measurable outcomes for end-users.
  • Judges will also assess the project’s impact on the wider community, including its integration with the surrounding environment and the social value it adds, such as fostering local engagement, enhancing community well-being, or driving sustainable growth.

You should ensure your entry provides sufficient detail on all three criteria.

 

Projects in this category must have been completed between 1 July 2023 and 1 July 2025.

Shortlisted projects in this category will be judged by face to face presentations from our judging panel.

Submission details (max 1,300 words)

  • A precis version of the full name of the project as it may appear in Awards marketing material (no more than 5 words)
  • The full and proper name of the project and a brief description of what the project is with a focus on the outcome (100 words max)
  • A fuller written description of the key reason/s why this project should be considered for this award, which pays attention to all six criteria being assessed. You can address each in turn or cover them all off collectively. Please remember to give clear reasoning with quantitative and qualitative evidence (where possible) as to why this project is deserving of award (max 1,200 words)

Please ensure you read and adhere to the requirements set out below in order for your entry to be accepted.

Entry Requirements

  • Project must have been completed between 1 July 2023 and 1 July 2025
  • Maximum 1 page Layout plans – A4
  • Maximum 3 images with no annotation or logos added

All entries to be submitted electronically as a pdf only – All images and drawings must be submitted as separate files either as (A4 sized) jpegs or pdfs.

Best Projects - Buildings 

Commercial property is the lifeblood of many local economies and this category recognises outstanding new commercial and mixed used buildings adding something special to the economic and working life of the area in which it sits. This category is open to all projects where the primary function/focus is on providing high quality lettable space.
£ 0.00
You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Judges will be scoring your entry against these six key criteria:

 

Criteria 1: Outcome
Demonstrate how the project has hit the brief, delivering a satisfied client and providing real user benefit and value beyond cost.

Judges will consider: extent of client satisfaction including delivery to cost/time/quality; extent of end user satisfaction in particular any improvement in service performance attributed to the project; judges will also consider impact on other, broader, stakeholders and the extent to which the project is harmonious with its environment and adds social value for the local community.

 

Criteria 2: Digital mindset

Demonstrate how the project team used the latest digital tools and thinking to provide better project outcomes.

Judges will consider: the extent to which the project team has pushed the boundaries for improving quality of design and efficiency and productivity of construction through use of digital tools; to what extent was standardisation/modularisation/offsite construction considered?; has the project developed a digital twin?

 

Criteria 3: Carbon reduction

Demonstrate use of sustainable materials and processes throughout the project, as well as design changes made to the project. Projects will be assessed on the savings made in both embodied and operational carbon.

Judges will consider: whether PAS 2080 principles have been adopted; how carbon reduction/sustainability was addressed at tender stage; how did carbon reduction change the design approach; was a carbon budget set?; was reduction in carbon measured?; where different materials or processes used to reduce carbon/improve sustainability.

 

Criteria 4: Climate resilience

Demonstrate decision making process to boost climate resilience of the finished project to future proof the work against the effects of climate change.

Judges will consider: how the design differs from similar project delivered previously in terms of climate resilience; how the need for climate resilience was assessed; how the risk was addressed without additional hard engineering solutions; whether mitigation measures that benefit the wider community were adopted.

 

Criteria 5: Collaborative working

Demonstrate how closer, more collaborative working has driven better project outcomes in terms of cost, time, quality or any of factor considered crucial to the client.

Judges will consider innovative procurement methods and other approaches to supply chain engagement; has the project explored a enterprise-style model as promoted by Project 13?; is there evidence of shared outcomes and a fair allocation of risk and reward?

 

Criteria 6: Getting it Right

Demonstrate how senior project team leaders created a positive working environment with strong values around equality, diversity and inclusivity; health, safety and wellbeing; community engagement and skills development.

Judges will look for clear evidence of action on equality, diversity and inclusivity; a strong health and safety record; action on worker wellbeing; active community engagement throughout the project; and initiatives to work with local schools and colleges and offer employment to local people.

 

You should ensure your entry provides sufficient detail on all six criteria.

 

Projects in this category must have been completed between 1 July 2023 and 1 July 2025.

 

Shortlisted projects in this category will be judged by face to face presentations from our judging panel.

Submission details (max 1,300 words)

  • A precis version of the full name of the project as it may appear in Awards marketing material (no more than 5 words)
  • The full and proper name of the project and a brief description of what the project is with a focus on the outcome (100 words max)
  • A fuller written description of the key reason/s why this project should be considered for this award, which pays attention to all six criteria being assessed. You can address each in turn or cover them all off collectively. Please remember to give clear reasoning with quantitative and qualitative evidence (where possible) as to why this project is deserving of award (max 1,200 words)

 

Please ensure you read and adhere to the requirements set out below in order for your entry to be accepted.

 

Entry Requirements

 

  • Project must have been completed between 1 July 2023 and 1 July 2025
  • Maximum 1 page Layout plans – A4
  • Maximum 3 images with no annotation or logos added

 

All entries to be submitted electronically as a pdf only – All images and drawings must be submitted as separate files either as (A4 sized) jpegs or pdfs.

Whether it is a leisure centre, museum, gallery, library or religion-based development, culture and leisure have a profound impact on people, communities, cities and nations. This award will recognise the very best cultural and leisure buildings and facilities, enhancing communities and contributing to their health and wellbeing through great design and delivery.

£ 0.00
You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Judges will be scoring your entry against these six key criteria:

 

Criteria 1: Outcome
Demonstrate how the project has hit the brief, delivering a satisfied client and providing real user benefit and value beyond cost.

Judges will consider: extent of client satisfaction including delivery to cost/time/quality; extent of end user satisfaction in particular any improvement in service performance attributed to the project; judges will also consider impact on other, broader, stakeholders and the extent to which the project is harmonious with its environment and adds social value for the local community.

 

Criteria 2: Digital mindset

Demonstrate how the project team used the latest digital tools and thinking to provide better project outcomes.

Judges will consider: the extent to which the project team has pushed the boundaries for improving quality of design and efficiency and productivity of construction through use of digital tools; to what extent was standardisation/modularisation/offsite construction considered?; has the project developed a digital twin?

 

Criteria 3: Carbon reduction

Demonstrate use of sustainable materials and processes throughout the project, as well as design changes made to the project. Projects will be assessed on the savings made in both embodied and operational carbon.

Judges will consider: whether PAS 2080 principles have been adopted; how carbon reduction/sustainability was addressed at tender stage; how did carbon reduction change the design approach; was a carbon budget set?; was reduction in carbon measured?; where different materials or processes used to reduce carbon/improve sustainability.

 

Criteria 4: Climate resilience

Demonstrate decision making process to boost climate resilience of the finished project to future proof the work against the effects of climate change.

Judges will consider: how the design differs from similar project delivered previously in terms of climate resilience; how the need for climate resilience was assessed; how the risk was addressed without additional hard engineering solutions; whether mitigation measures that benefit the wider community were adopted.

 

Criteria 5: Collaborative working

Demonstrate how closer, more collaborative working has driven better project outcomes in terms of cost, time, quality or any of factor considered crucial to the client.

Judges will consider innovative procurement methods and other approaches to supply chain engagement; has the project explored a enterprise-style model as promoted by Project 13?; is there evidence of shared outcomes and a fair allocation of risk and reward?

 

Criteria 6: Getting it Right

Demonstrate how senior project team leaders created a positive working environment with strong values around equality, diversity and inclusivity; health, safety and wellbeing; community engagement and skills development.

Judges will look for clear evidence of action on equality, diversity and inclusivity; a strong health and safety record; action on worker wellbeing; active community engagement throughout the project; and initiatives to work with local schools and colleges and offer employment to local peoplet.

 

You should ensure your entry provides sufficient detail on all six criteria.

 

Projects in this category must have been completed between 1 July 2023 and 1 July 2025.

 

Shortlisted projects in this category will be judged by face to face presentations from our judging panel.

Submission details (max 1,300 words)

  • A precis version of the full name of the project as it may appear in Awards marketing material (no more than 5 words)
  • The full and proper name of the project and a brief description of what the project is with a focus on the outcome (100 words max)
  • A fuller written description of the key reason/s why this project should be considered for this award, which pays attention to all six criteria being assessed. You can address each in turn or cover them all off collectively. Please remember to give clear reasoning with quantitative and qualitative evidence (where possible) as to why this project is deserving of award (max 1,200 words)

 

Please ensure you read and adhere to the requirements set out below in order for your entry to be accepted.

 

Entry Requirements

 

  • Project must have been completed between 1 July 2023 and 1 July 2025
  • Maximum 1 page Layout plans – A4
  • Maximum 3 images with no annotation or logos added

 

All entries to be submitted electronically as a pdf only – All images and drawings must be submitted as separate files either as (A4 sized) jpegs or pdfs.

This category recognises the most exceptional buildings in meeting Britain’s housing needs whether it is a small residential development, major new community development, student accommodation or later living. The category is open to all projects where housing/accommodation provision is the primary purpose. The entire project does not have to be completed but the phase of work that the entry centres on must be complete.

£ 0.00
You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Judges will be scoring your entry against these six key criteria:

 

Criteria 1: Outcome
Demonstrate how the project has hit the brief, delivering a satisfied client and providing real user benefit and value beyond cost.

Judges will consider: extent of client satisfaction including delivery to cost/time/quality; extent of end user satisfaction in particular any improvement in service performance attributed to the project; judges will also consider impact on other, broader, stakeholders and the extent to which the project is harmonious with its environment and adds social value for the local community.

 

Criteria 2: Digital mindset

Demonstrate how the project team used the latest digital tools and thinking to provide better project outcomes.

Judges will consider: the extent to which the project team has pushed the boundaries for improving quality of design and efficiency and productivity of construction through use of digital tools; to what extent was standardisation/modularisation/offsite construction considered?; has the project developed a digital twin?

 

Criteria 3: Carbon reduction

Demonstrate use of sustainable materials and processes throughout the project, as well as design changes made to the project. Projects will be assessed on the savings made in both embodied and operational carbon.

Judges will consider: whether PAS 2080 principles have been adopted; how carbon reduction/sustainability was addressed at tender stage; how did carbon reduction change the design approach; was a carbon budget set?; was reduction in carbon measured?; where different materials or processes used to reduce carbon/improve sustainability.

 

Criteria 4: Climate resilience

Demonstrate decision making process to boost climate resilience of the finished project to future proof the work against the effects of climate change.

Judges will consider: how the design differs from similar project delivered previously in terms of climate resilience; how the need for climate resilience was assessed; how the risk was addressed without additional hard engineering solutions; whether mitigation measures that benefit the wider community were adopted.

 

Criteria 5: Collaborative working

Demonstrate how closer, more collaborative working has driven better project outcomes in terms of cost, time, quality or any of factor considered crucial to the client.

Judges will consider innovative procurement methods and other approaches to supply chain engagement; has the project explored a enterprise-style model as promoted by Project 13?; is there evidence of shared outcomes and a fair allocation of risk and reward?

 

Criteria 6: Getting it Right

Demonstrate how senior project team leaders created a positive working environment with strong values around equality, diversity and inclusivity; health, safety and wellbeing; community engagement and skills development.

Judges will look for clear evidence of action on equality, diversity and inclusivity; a strong health and safety record; action on worker wellbeing; active community engagement throughout the project; and initiatives to work with local schools and colleges and offer employment to local people.

 

You should ensure your entry provides sufficient detail on all six criteria.

 

Projects in this category must have been completed between 1 July 2023 and 1 July 2025.

 

Shortlisted projects in this category will be judged by face to face presentations from our judging panel.

Submission details (max 1,300 words)

  • A precis version of the full name of the project as it may appear in Awards marketing material (no more than 5 words)
  • The full and proper name of the project and a brief description of what the project is with a focus on the outcome (100 words max)
  • A fuller written description of the key reason/s why this project should be considered for this award, which pays attention to all six criteria being assessed. You can address each in turn or cover them all off collectively. Please remember to give clear reasoning with quantitative and qualitative evidence (where possible) as to why this project is deserving of award (max 1,200 words)

 

Please ensure you read and adhere to the requirements set out below in order for your entry to be accepted.

 

Entry Requirements

 

  • Project must have been completed between 1 July 2023 and 1 July 2025
  • Maximum 1 page Layout plans – A4
  • Maximum 3 images with no annotation or logos added

 

All entries to be submitted electronically as a pdf only – All images and drawings must be submitted as separate files either as (A4 sized) jpegs or pdfs.

The growing value of retrofitting in a carbon and cost sensitive industry has great implications for older buildings and for the retention of heritage assets. This award will recognised best of retrofitting across all sectors, where those involved have given new or improved life to buildings and infrastructure – enhancing long term outcomes, creating a new or renewed purposes and delivering economic, social and environmental dividends.
£ 0.00
You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Judges will be scoring your entry against these six key criteria:

 

Criteria 1: Outcome
Demonstrate how the project has hit the brief, delivering a satisfied client and providing real user benefit and value beyond cost.

Judges will consider: extent of client satisfaction including delivery to cost/time/quality; extent of end user satisfaction in particular any improvement in service performance attributed to the project; judges will also consider impact on other, broader, stakeholders and the extent to which the project is harmonious with its environment and adds social value for the local community.

 

Criteria 2: Digital mindset

Demonstrate how the project team used the latest digital tools and thinking to provide better project outcomes.

Judges will consider: the extent to which the project team has pushed the boundaries for improving quality of design and efficiency and productivity of construction through use of digital tools; to what extent was standardisation/modularisation/offsite construction considered?; has the project developed a digital twin?

 

Criteria 3: Carbon reduction

Demonstrate use of sustainable materials and processes throughout the project, as well as design changes made to the project. Projects will be assessed on the savings made in both embodied and operational carbon.

Judges will consider: whether PAS 2080 principles have been adopted; how carbon reduction/sustainability was addressed at tender stage; how did carbon reduction change the design approach; was a carbon budget set?; was reduction in carbon measured?; where different materials or processes used to reduce carbon/improve sustainability.

 

Criteria 4: Climate resilience

Demonstrate decision making process to boost climate resilience of the finished project to future proof the work against the effects of climate change.

Judges will consider: how the design differs from similar project delivered previously in terms of climate resilience; how the need for climate resilience was assessed; how the risk was addressed without additional hard engineering solutions; whether mitigation measures that benefit the wider community were adopted.

 

Criteria 5: Collaborative working

Demonstrate how closer, more collaborative working has driven better project outcomes in terms of cost, time, quality or any of factor considered crucial to the client.

Judges will consider innovative procurement methods and other approaches to supply chain engagement; has the project explored a enterprise-style model as promoted by Project 13?; is there evidence of shared outcomes and a fair allocation of risk and reward?

 

Criteria 6: Getting it Right

Demonstrate how senior project team leaders created a positive working environment with strong values around equality, diversity and inclusivity; health, safety and wellbeing; community engagement and skills development.

Judges will look for clear evidence of action on equality, diversity and inclusivity; a strong health and safety record; action on worker wellbeing; active community engagement throughout the project; and initiatives to work with local schools and colleges and offer employment to local people.

 

You should ensure your entry provides sufficient detail on all six criteria.

 

Projects in this category must have been completed between 1 July 2023 and 1 July 2025.

 

Shortlisted projects in this category will be judged by face to face presentations from our judging panel.

Submission details (max 1,300 words)

  • A precis version of the full name of the project as it may appear in Awards marketing material (no more than 5 words)
  • The full and proper name of the project and a brief description of what the project is with a focus on the outcome (100 words max)
  • A fuller written description of the key reason/s why this project should be considered for this award, which pays attention to all six criteria being assessed. You can address each in turn or cover them all off collectively. Please remember to give clear reasoning with quantitative and qualitative evidence (where possible) as to why this project is deserving of award (max 1,200 words)

 

Please ensure you read and adhere to the requirements set out below in order for your entry to be accepted.

 

Entry Requirements

 

  • Project must have been completed between 1 July 2023 and 1 July 2025
  • Maximum 1 page Layout plans – A4
  • Maximum 3 images with no annotation or logos added

 

All entries to be submitted electronically as a pdf only – All images and drawings must be submitted as separate files either as (A4 sized) jpegs or pdfs.

The very best in social infrastructure can enhance not only the environment in which it sits, but the services that it provides. This award will recognise the best projects spanning schools, colleges, universities, hospitals, research facilities, law courts, prisons and other civic buildings for its contribution to improved social service provision in the UK.

£ 0.00
You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Judges will be scoring your entry against these six key criteria:

 

Criteria 1: Outcome
Demonstrate how the project has hit the brief, delivering a satisfied client and providing real user benefit and value beyond cost.

Judges will consider: extent of client satisfaction including delivery to cost/time/quality; extent of end user satisfaction in particular any improvement in service performance attributed to the project; judges will also consider impact on other, broader, stakeholders and the extent to which the project is harmonious with its environment and adds social value for the local community.

 

Criteria 2: Digital mindset

Demonstrate how the project team used the latest digital tools and thinking to provide better project outcomes.

Judges will consider: the extent to which the project team has pushed the boundaries for improving quality of design and efficiency and productivity of construction through use of digital tools; to what extent was standardisation/modularisation/offsite construction considered?; has the project developed a digital twin?

 

Criteria 3: Carbon reduction

Demonstrate use of sustainable materials and processes throughout the project, as well as design changes made to the project. Projects will be assessed on the savings made in both embodied and operational carbon.

Judges will consider: whether PAS 2080 principles have been adopted; how carbon reduction/sustainability was addressed at tender stage; how did carbon reduction change the design approach; was a carbon budget set?; was reduction in carbon measured?; where different materials or processes used to reduce carbon/improve sustainability.

 

Criteria 4: Climate resilience

Demonstrate decision making process to boost climate resilience of the finished project to future proof the work against the effects of climate change.

Judges will consider: how the design differs from similar project delivered previously in terms of climate resilience; how the need for climate resilience was assessed; how the risk was addressed without additional hard engineering solutions; whether mitigation measures that benefit the wider community were adopted.

 

Criteria 5: Collaborative working

Demonstrate how closer, more collaborative working has driven better project outcomes in terms of cost, time, quality or any of factor considered crucial to the client.

Judges will consider innovative procurement methods and other approaches to supply chain engagement; has the project explored a enterprise-style model as promoted by Project 13?; is there evidence of shared outcomes and a fair allocation of risk and reward?

 

Criteria 6: Getting it Right

Demonstrate how senior project team leaders created a positive working environment with strong values around equality, diversity and inclusivity; health, safety and wellbeing; community engagement and skills development.

Judges will look for clear evidence of action on equality, diversity and inclusivity; a strong health and safety record; action on worker wellbeing; active community engagement throughout the project; and initiatives to work with local schools and colleges and offer employment to local people.

 

You should ensure your entry provides sufficient detail on all six criteria.

 

Projects in this category must have been completed between 1 July 2023 and 1 July 2025.

 

Shortlisted projects in this category will be judged by face to face presentations from our judging panel.

Submission details (max 1,300 words)

  • A precis version of the full name of the project as it may appear in Awards marketing material (no more than 5 words)
  • The full and proper name of the project and a brief description of what the project is with a focus on the outcome (100 words max)
  • A fuller written description of the key reason/s why this project should be considered for this award, which pays attention to all six criteria being assessed. You can address each in turn or cover them all off collectively. Please remember to give clear reasoning with quantitative and qualitative evidence (where possible) as to why this project is deserving of award (max 1,200 words)

 

Please ensure you read and adhere to the requirements set out below in order for your entry to be accepted.

 

Entry Requirements

 

  • Project must have been completed between 1 July 2023 and 1 July 2025
  • Maximum 1 page Layout plans – A4
  • Maximum 3 images with no annotation or logos added

 

All entries to be submitted electronically as a pdf only – All images and drawings must be submitted as separate files either as (A4 sized) jpegs or pdfs.

Best Projects - Infrastructure 

The best projects across a rapidly changing energy sector that advance sustainability, efficiency, and reliability and security. Judges will focus on projects that contribute to the transition to cleaner energy sources, enhance energy infrastructure, or drive innovation in energy management. Entries should demonstrate how the project has delivered measurable environmental benefits, supported energy resilience, and met both current and future energy needs in a sustainable manner.
£ 0.00
You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Judges will be scoring your entry against these six key criteria:

 

Criteria 1: Outcome
Demonstrate how the project has hit the brief, delivering a satisfied client and providing real user benefit and value beyond cost.

Judges will consider: extent of client satisfaction including delivery to cost/time/quality; extent of end user satisfaction in particular any improvement in service performance attributed to the project; judges will also consider impact on other, broader, stakeholders and the extent to which the project is harmonious with its environment and adds social value for the local community.

 

Criteria 2: Digital mindset

Demonstrate how the project team used the latest digital tools and thinking to provide better project outcomes.

Judges will consider: the extent to which the project team has pushed the boundaries for improving quality of design and efficiency and productivity of construction through use of digital tools; to what extent was standardisation/modularisation/offsite construction considered?; has the project developed a digital twin?

 

Criteria 3: Carbon reduction

Demonstrate use of sustainable materials and processes throughout the project, as well as design changes made to the project. Projects will be assessed on the savings made in both embodied and operational carbon.

Judges will consider: whether PAS 2080 principles have been adopted; how carbon reduction/sustainability was addressed at tender stage; how did carbon reduction change the design approach; was a carbon budget set?; was reduction in carbon measured?; where different materials or processes used to reduce carbon/improve sustainability.

 

Criteria 4: Climate resilience

Demonstrate decision making process to boost climate resilience of the finished project to future proof the work against the effects of climate change.

Judges will consider: how the design differs from similar project delivered previously in terms of climate resilience; how the need for climate resilience was assessed; how the risk was addressed without additional hard engineering solutions; whether mitigation measures that benefit the wider community were adopted.

 

Criteria 5: Collaborative working

Demonstrate how closer, more collaborative working has driven better project outcomes in terms of cost, time, quality or any of factor considered crucial to the client.

Judges will consider innovative procurement methods and other approaches to supply chain engagement; has the project explored a enterprise-style model as promoted by Project 13?; is there evidence of shared outcomes and a fair allocation of risk and reward?

 

Criteria 6: Getting it Right

Demonstrate how senior project team leaders created a positive working environment with strong values around equality, diversity and inclusivity; health, safety and wellbeing; community engagement and skills development.

Judges will look for clear evidence of action on equality, diversity and inclusivity; a strong health and safety record; action on worker wellbeing; active community engagement throughout the project; and initiatives to work with local schools and colleges and offer employment to local people.

 

You should ensure your entry provides sufficient detail on all six criteria.

 

Projects in this category must have been completed between 1 July 2023 and 1 July 2025.

 

Shortlisted projects in this category will be judged by face to face presentations from our judging panel.

Submission details (max 1,300 words)

  • A precis version of the full name of the project as it may appear in Awards marketing material (no more than 5 words)
  • The full and proper name of the project and a brief description of what the project is with a focus on the outcome (100 words max)
  • A fuller written description of the key reason/s why this project should be considered for this award, which pays attention to all six criteria being assessed. You can address each in turn or cover them all off collectively. Please remember to give clear reasoning with quantitative and qualitative evidence (where possible) as to why this project is deserving of award (max 1,200 words)

 

Please ensure you read and adhere to the requirements set out below in order for your entry to be accepted.

 

Entry Requirements

 

  • Project must have been completed between 1 July 2023 and 1 July 2025
  • Maximum 1 page Layout plans – A4
  • Maximum 3 images with no annotation or logos added

 

All entries to be submitted electronically as a pdf only – All images and drawings must be submitted as separate files either as (A4 sized) jpegs or pdfs.

Climate change is already impacting on our infrastructure and communities and this award recognises the best projects delivering environmental improvements for local communities and regions. The winning award will achieve remarkable mitigation of the impact of extreme weather and climate change – along with other environmental hazards - on people, properties and business.
£ 0.00
You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Judges will be scoring your entry against these six key criteria:

 

Criteria 1: Outcome
Demonstrate how the project has hit the brief, delivering a satisfied client and providing real user benefit and value beyond cost.

Judges will consider: extent of client satisfaction including delivery to cost/time/quality; extent of end user satisfaction in particular any improvement in service performance attributed to the project; judges will also consider impact on other, broader, stakeholders and the extent to which the project is harmonious with its environment and adds social value for the local community.

 

Criteria 2: Digital mindset

Demonstrate how the project team used the latest digital tools and thinking to provide better project outcomes.

Judges will consider: the extent to which the project team has pushed the boundaries for improving quality of design and efficiency and productivity of construction through use of digital tools; to what extent was standardisation/modularisation/offsite construction considered?; has the project developed a digital twin?

 

Criteria 3: Carbon reduction

Demonstrate use of sustainable materials and processes throughout the project, as well as design changes made to the project. Projects will be assessed on the savings made in both embodied and operational carbon.

Judges will consider: whether PAS 2080 principles have been adopted; how carbon reduction/sustainability was addressed at tender stage; how did carbon reduction change the design approach; was a carbon budget set?; was reduction in carbon measured?; where different materials or processes used to reduce carbon/improve sustainability.

 

Criteria 4: Climate resilience

Demonstrate decision making process to boost climate resilience of the finished project to future proof the work against the effects of climate change.

Judges will consider: how the design differs from similar project delivered previously in terms of climate resilience; how the need for climate resilience was assessed; how the risk was addressed without additional hard engineering solutions; whether mitigation measures that benefit the wider community were adopted.

 

Criteria 5: Collaborative working

Demonstrate how closer, more collaborative working has driven better project outcomes in terms of cost, time, quality or any of factor considered crucial to the client.

Judges will consider innovative procurement methods and other approaches to supply chain engagement; has the project explored a enterprise-style model as promoted by Project 13?; is there evidence of shared outcomes and a fair allocation of risk and reward?

 

Criteria 6: Getting it Right

Demonstrate how senior project team leaders created a positive working environment with strong values around equality, diversity and inclusivity; health, safety and wellbeing; community engagement and skills development.

Judges will look for clear evidence of action on equality, diversity and inclusivity; a strong health and safety record; action on worker wellbeing; active community engagement throughout the project; and initiatives to work with local schools and colleges and offer employment to local people.

 

You should ensure your entry provides sufficient detail on all six criteria.

 

Projects in this category must have been completed between 1 July 2023 and 1 July 2025.

 

Shortlisted projects in this category will be judged by face to face presentations from our judging panel.

Submission details (max 1,300 words)

  • A precis version of the full name of the project as it may appear in Awards marketing material (no more than 5 words)
  • The full and proper name of the project and a brief description of what the project is with a focus on the outcome (100 words max)
  • A fuller written description of the key reason/s why this project should be considered for this award, which pays attention to all six criteria being assessed. You can address each in turn or cover them all off collectively. Please remember to give clear reasoning with quantitative and qualitative evidence (where possible) as to why this project is deserving of award (max 1,200 words)

 

Please ensure you read and adhere to the requirements set out below in order for your entry to be accepted.

 

Entry Requirements

 

  • Project must have been completed between 1 July 2023 and 1 July 2025
  • Maximum 1 page Layout plans – A4
  • Maximum 3 images with no annotation or logos added

 

All entries to be submitted electronically as a pdf only – All images and drawings must be submitted as separate files either as (A4 sized) jpegs or pdfs.

This category recognises the best placemaking projects that have transformed public spaces or urban environments to enhance the quality of life for communities. Judges will look for projects that demonstrate thoughtful design, sustainability, and a strong sense of place, contributing to social, economic, and environmental well-being. Entries should highlight how the project has fostered community engagement, improved accessibility, and created vibrant, enduring spaces that support diverse uses and activities.
£ 0.00
You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Judges will be scoring your entry against these six key criteria:

 

Criteria 1: Outcome
Demonstrate how the project has hit the brief, delivering a satisfied client and providing real user benefit and value beyond cost.

Judges will consider: extent of client satisfaction including delivery to cost/time/quality; extent of end user satisfaction in particular any improvement in service performance attributed to the project; judges will also consider impact on other, broader, stakeholders and the extent to which the project is harmonious with its environment and adds social value for the local community.

 

Criteria 2: Digital mindset

Demonstrate how the project team used the latest digital tools and thinking to provide better project outcomes.

Judges will consider: the extent to which the project team has pushed the boundaries for improving quality of design and efficiency and productivity of construction through use of digital tools; to what extent was standardisation/modularisation/offsite construction considered?; has the project developed a digital twin?

 

Criteria 3: Carbon reduction

Demonstrate use of sustainable materials and processes throughout the project, as well as design changes made to the project. Projects will be assessed on the savings made in both embodied and operational carbon.

Judges will consider: whether PAS 2080 principles have been adopted; how carbon reduction/sustainability was addressed at tender stage; how did carbon reduction change the design approach; was a carbon budget set?; was reduction in carbon measured?; where different materials or processes used to reduce carbon/improve sustainability.

 

Criteria 4: Climate resilience

Demonstrate decision making process to boost climate resilience of the finished project to future proof the work against the effects of climate change.

Judges will consider: how the design differs from similar project delivered previously in terms of climate resilience; how the need for climate resilience was assessed; how the risk was addressed without additional hard engineering solutions; whether mitigation measures that benefit the wider community were adopted.

 

Criteria 5: Collaborative working

Demonstrate how closer, more collaborative working has driven better project outcomes in terms of cost, time, quality or any of factor considered crucial to the client.

Judges will consider innovative procurement methods and other approaches to supply chain engagement; has the project explored a enterprise-style model as promoted by Project 13?; is there evidence of shared outcomes and a fair allocation of risk and reward?

 

Criteria 6: Getting it Right

Demonstrate how senior project team leaders created a positive working environment with strong values around equality, diversity and inclusivity; health, safety and wellbeing; community engagement and skills development.

Judges will look for clear evidence of action on equality, diversity and inclusivity; a strong health and safety record; action on worker wellbeing; active community engagement throughout the project; and initiatives to work with local schools and colleges and offer employment to local people.

 

You should ensure your entry provides sufficient detail on all six criteria.

 

Projects in this category must have been completed between 1 July 2023 and 1 July 2025.

 

Shortlisted projects in this category will be judged by face to face presentations from our judging panel.

Submission details (max 1,300 words)

  • A precis version of the full name of the project as it may appear in Awards marketing material (no more than 5 words)
  • The full and proper name of the project and a brief description of what the project is with a focus on the outcome (100 words max)
  • A fuller written description of the key reason/s why this project should be considered for this award, which pays attention to all six criteria being assessed. You can address each in turn or cover them all off collectively. Please remember to give clear reasoning with quantitative and qualitative evidence (where possible) as to why this project is deserving of award (max 1,200 words)

 

Please ensure you read and adhere to the requirements set out below in order for your entry to be accepted.

 

Entry Requirements

 

  • Project must have been completed between 1 July 2023 and 1 July 2025
  • Maximum 1 page Layout plans – A4
  • Maximum 3 images with no annotation or logos added

 

All entries to be submitted electronically as a pdf only – All images and drawings must be submitted as separate files either as (A4 sized) jpegs or pdfs.

Transport is the centre of economic and social connectivity and is a major part of the UK’s ambitions for generating growth and improving social cohesion. This award will recognise the best transport project design and delivery – be it to enhance capacity, provide better connectivity or improve reliability – at a local, regional or national level.
£ 0.00
You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Judges will be scoring your entry against these six key criteria:

 

Criteria 1: Outcome
Demonstrate how the project has hit the brief, delivering a satisfied client and providing real user benefit and value beyond cost.

Judges will consider: extent of client satisfaction including delivery to cost/time/quality; extent of end user satisfaction in particular any improvement in service performance attributed to the project; judges will also consider impact on other, broader, stakeholders and the extent to which the project is harmonious with its environment and adds social value for the local community.

 

Criteria 2: Digital mindset

Demonstrate how the project team used the latest digital tools and thinking to provide better project outcomes.

Judges will consider: the extent to which the project team has pushed the boundaries for improving quality of design and efficiency and productivity of construction through use of digital tools; to what extent was standardisation/modularisation/offsite construction considered?; has the project developed a digital twin?

 

Criteria 3: Carbon reduction

Demonstrate use of sustainable materials and processes throughout the project, as well as design changes made to the project. Projects will be assessed on the savings made in both embodied and operational carbon.

Judges will consider: whether PAS 2080 principles have been adopted; how carbon reduction/sustainability was addressed at tender stage; how did carbon reduction change the design approach; was a carbon budget set?; was reduction in carbon measured?; where different materials or processes used to reduce carbon/improve sustainability.

 

Criteria 4: Climate resilience

Demonstrate decision making process to boost climate resilience of the finished project to future proof the work against the effects of climate change.

Judges will consider: how the design differs from similar project delivered previously in terms of climate resilience; how the need for climate resilience was assessed; how the risk was addressed without additional hard engineering solutions; whether mitigation measures that benefit the wider community were adopted.

 

Criteria 5: Collaborative working

Demonstrate how closer, more collaborative working has driven better project outcomes in terms of cost, time, quality or any of factor considered crucial to the client.

Judges will consider innovative procurement methods and other approaches to supply chain engagement; has the project explored a enterprise-style model as promoted by Project 13?; is there evidence of shared outcomes and a fair allocation of risk and reward?

 

Criteria 6: Getting it Right

Demonstrate how senior project team leaders created a positive working environment with strong values around equality, diversity and inclusivity; health, safety and wellbeing; community engagement and skills development.

Judges will look for clear evidence of action on equality, diversity and inclusivity; a strong health and safety record; action on worker wellbeing; active community engagement throughout the project; and initiatives to work with local schools and colleges and offer employment to local people.

 

You should ensure your entry provides sufficient detail on all six criteria.

 

Projects in this category must have been completed between 1 July 2023 and 1 July 2025.

 

Shortlisted projects in this category will be judged by face to face presentations from our judging panel.

Submission details (max 1,300 words)

  • A precis version of the full name of the project as it may appear in Awards marketing material (no more than 5 words)
  • The full and proper name of the project and a brief description of what the project is with a focus on the outcome (100 words max)
  • A fuller written description of the key reason/s why this project should be considered for this award, which pays attention to all six criteria being assessed. You can address each in turn or cover them all off collectively. Please remember to give clear reasoning with quantitative and qualitative evidence (where possible) as to why this project is deserving of award (max 1,200 words)

 

Please ensure you read and adhere to the requirements set out below in order for your entry to be accepted.

 

Entry Requirements

 

  • Project must have been completed between 1 July 2023 and 1 July 2025
  • Maximum 1 page Layout plans – A4
  • Maximum 3 images with no annotation or logos added

 

All entries to be submitted electronically as a pdf only – All images and drawings must be submitted as separate files either as (A4 sized) jpegs or pdfs.

The upgrade and renewal of existing assets, including the rapidly growing number of aging assets across the UK’s built environment, represents a huge responsibility and opportunity to ensure the best possible outcomes on the widest scale. This award will recognise the best maintenance and renewal project – be it a standalone, one-off project or part of an ongoing operations or maintenance programme – for delivering remarkable outcomes and value in any sector.
£ 0.00
You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Judges will be scoring your entry against these six key criteria:

 

Criteria 1: Outcome
Demonstrate how the project has hit the brief, delivering a satisfied client and providing real user benefit and value beyond cost.

Judges will consider: extent of client satisfaction including delivery to cost/time/quality; extent of end user satisfaction in particular any improvement in service performance attributed to the project; judges will also consider impact on other, broader, stakeholders and the extent to which the project is harmonious with its environment and adds social value for the local community.

 

Criteria 2: Digital mindset

Demonstrate how the project team used the latest digital tools and thinking to provide better project outcomes.

Judges will consider: the extent to which the project team has pushed the boundaries for improving quality of design and efficiency and productivity of construction through use of digital tools; to what extent was standardisation/modularisation/offsite construction considered?; has the project developed a digital twin?

 

Criteria 3: Carbon reduction

Demonstrate use of sustainable materials and processes throughout the project, as well as design changes made to the project. Projects will be assessed on the savings made in both embodied and operational carbon.

Judges will consider: whether PAS 2080 principles have been adopted; how carbon reduction/sustainability was addressed at tender stage; how did carbon reduction change the design approach; was a carbon budget set?; was reduction in carbon measured?; where different materials or processes used to reduce carbon/improve sustainability.

 

Criteria 4: Climate resilience

Demonstrate decision making process to boost climate resilience of the finished project to future proof the work against the effects of climate change.

Judges will consider: how the design differs from similar project delivered previously in terms of climate resilience; how the need for climate resilience was assessed; how the risk was addressed without additional hard engineering solutions; whether mitigation measures that benefit the wider community were adopted.

 

Criteria 5: Collaborative working

Demonstrate how closer, more collaborative working has driven better project outcomes in terms of cost, time, quality or any of factor considered crucial to the client.

Judges will consider innovative procurement methods and other approaches to supply chain engagement; has the project explored a enterprise-style model as promoted by Project 13?; is there evidence of shared outcomes and a fair allocation of risk and reward?

 

Criteria 6: Getting it Right

Demonstrate how senior project team leaders created a positive working environment with strong values around equality, diversity and inclusivity; health, safety and wellbeing; community engagement and skills development.

Judges will look for clear evidence of action on equality, diversity and inclusivity; a strong health and safety record; action on worker wellbeing; active community engagement throughout the project; and initiatives to work with local schools and colleges and offer employment to local people.

 

You should ensure your entry provides sufficient detail on all six criteria.

 

Projects in this category must have been completed between 1 July 2023 and 1 July 2025.

 

Shortlisted projects in this category will be judged by face to face presentations from our judging panel.

Submission details (max 1,300 words)

  • A precis version of the full name of the project as it may appear in Awards marketing material (no more than 5 words)
  • The full and proper name of the project and a brief description of what the project is with a focus on the outcome (100 words max)
  • A fuller written description of the key reason/s why this project should be considered for this award, which pays attention to all six criteria being assessed. You can address each in turn or cover them all off collectively. Please remember to give clear reasoning with quantitative and qualitative evidence (where possible) as to why this project is deserving of award (max 1,200 words)

 

Please ensure you read and adhere to the requirements set out below in order for your entry to be accepted.

 

Entry Requirements

 

  • Project must have been completed between 1 July 2023 and 1 July 2025
  • Maximum 1 page Layout plans – A4
  • Maximum 3 images with no annotation or logos added

 

All entries to be submitted electronically as a pdf only – All images and drawings must be submitted as separate files either as (A4 sized) jpegs or pdfs.

This category recognises outstanding projects within the water sector, driving improvements in the resilience, quality, and sustainability of the UK’s water and wastewater facilities. Judges will look for projects that demonstrate innovative approaches to managing water resources, enhancing service reliability, and delivering tangible benefits for communities and the environment.
£ 0.00
You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Judges will be scoring your entry against these six key criteria:

 

Criteria 1: Outcome
Demonstrate how the project has hit the brief, delivering a satisfied client and providing real user benefit and value beyond cost.

Judges will consider: extent of client satisfaction including delivery to cost/time/quality; extent of end user satisfaction in particular any improvement in service performance attributed to the project; judges will also consider impact on other, broader, stakeholders and the extent to which the project is harmonious with its environment and adds social value for the local community.

 

Criteria 2: Digital mindset

Demonstrate how the project team used the latest digital tools and thinking to provide better project outcomes.

Judges will consider: the extent to which the project team has pushed the boundaries for improving quality of design and efficiency and productivity of construction through use of digital tools; to what extent was standardisation/modularisation/offsite construction considered?; has the project developed a digital twin?

 

Criteria 3: Carbon reduction

Demonstrate use of sustainable materials and processes throughout the project, as well as design changes made to the project. Projects will be assessed on the savings made in both embodied and operational carbon.

Judges will consider: whether PAS 2080 principles have been adopted; how carbon reduction/sustainability was addressed at tender stage; how did carbon reduction change the design approach; was a carbon budget set?; was reduction in carbon measured?; where different materials or processes used to reduce carbon/improve sustainability.

 

Criteria 4: Climate resilience

Demonstrate decision making process to boost climate resilience of the finished project to future proof the work against the effects of climate change.

Judges will consider: how the design differs from similar project delivered previously in terms of climate resilience; how the need for climate resilience was assessed; how the risk was addressed without additional hard engineering solutions; whether mitigation measures that benefit the wider community were adopted.

 

Criteria 5: Collaborative working

Demonstrate how closer, more collaborative working has driven better project outcomes in terms of cost, time, quality or any of factor considered crucial to the client.

Judges will consider innovative procurement methods and other approaches to supply chain engagement; has the project explored a enterprise-style model as promoted by Project 13?; is there evidence of shared outcomes and a fair allocation of risk and reward?

 

Criteria 6: Getting it Right

Demonstrate how senior project team leaders created a positive working environment with strong values around equality, diversity and inclusivity; health, safety and wellbeing; community engagement and skills development.

Judges will look for clear evidence of action on equality, diversity and inclusivity; a strong health and safety record; action on worker wellbeing; active community engagement throughout the project; and initiatives to work with local schools and colleges and offer employment to local people.

 

You should ensure your entry provides sufficient detail on all six criteria.

 

Projects in this category must have been completed between 1 July 2023 and 1 July 2025.

 

Shortlisted projects in this category will be judged by face to face presentations from our judging panel.

Submission details (max 1,300 words)

  • A precis version of the full name of the project as it may appear in Awards marketing material (no more than 5 words)
  • The full and proper name of the project and a brief description of what the project is with a focus on the outcome (100 words max)
  • A fuller written description of the key reason/s why this project should be considered for this award, which pays attention to all six criteria being assessed. You can address each in turn or cover them all off collectively. Please remember to give clear reasoning with quantitative and qualitative evidence (where possible) as to why this project is deserving of award (max 1,200 words)

 

Please ensure you read and adhere to the requirements set out below in order for your entry to be accepted.

 

Entry Requirements

 

  • Project must have been completed between 1 July 2023 and 1 July 2025
  • Maximum 1 page Layout plans – A4
  • Maximum 3 images with no annotation or logos added

 

All entries to be submitted electronically as a pdf only – All images and drawings must be submitted as separate files either as (A4 sized) jpegs or pdfs.

Best Projects - Building & Infrastructure 

This category recognises the best projects successfully delivered outside the UK, showcasing exceptional innovation, collaboration, and impact on a global scale. Judges will look for projects that demonstrate cultural sensitivity, effective cross-border teamwork, and a tangible positive influence on the local or regional community. Entries should highlight how the project overcame international challenges, delivered exceptional results, and contributed to the global goals of sustainability, development, and progress.
£ 0.00
You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Judges will be scoring your entry against these six key criteria:

 

Criteria 1: Outcome
Demonstrate how the project has hit the brief, delivering a satisfied client and providing real user benefit and value beyond cost.

Judges will consider: extent of client satisfaction including delivery to cost/time/quality; extent of end user satisfaction in particular any improvement in service performance attributed to the project; judges will also consider impact on other, broader, stakeholders and the extent to which the project is harmonious with its environment and adds social value for the local community.

 

Criteria 2: Digital mindset

Demonstrate how the project team used the latest digital tools and thinking to provide better project outcomes and enhanced cross-border collaboration and delivery.

Judges will consider: the extent to which the project team has pushed the boundaries for improving quality of design and efficiency and productivity of construction through use of digital tools; with a particular focus on how these tools supported international co-operation and excellence of outcome.

 

Criteria 3: Carbon reduction

Demonstrate use of sustainable materials and processes throughout the project, as well as design changes made to the project. Projects will be assessed on the savings made in both embodied and operational carbon beyond the norm in the country it’s based in.

Judges will consider: whether strong decarbonisation principles and tools have been adopted; how carbon reduction/sustainability was addressed at tender stage; whether carbon reduction changed the design or delivery approach; whether a carbon budget was set; was reduction in carbon measured?; where different materials or processes used to reduce carbon/improve sustainability – all relative to the conditions in the geographic location.

 

Criteria 4: Climate resilience

Demonstrate decision making process to boost climate resilience of the finished project to future proof the work against the effects of climate change.

Judges will consider: how the design differs from similar projects delivered previously in terms of climate resilience; how the need for climate resilience was assessed; how the risk was addressed without additional hard engineering solutions; whether mitigation measures that benefit the wider community were adopted.

 

Criteria 5: Collaborative working

Demonstrate how closer, more collaborative working across borders has been established and how it has driven better project outcomes in terms of cost, time, quality or any factor considered crucial to the client.

Judges will consider innovative procurement methods and other approaches to supply chain engagement; whether the project explored an enterprise-style model as promoted by Project 13?; and whether there is evidence of shared outcomes and a fair allocation of risk and reward across the project team?

 

Criteria 6: Getting it Right

Demonstrate how senior project team leaders created a positive working environment with strong values around equality, diversity and inclusivity; health, safety and wellbeing; community engagement and skills development.

Judges will look for clear evidence of action on equality, diversity and inclusivity; a strong health and safety record; action on worker wellbeing; active community engagement throughout the project; and initiatives to work with local schools and colleges and offer employment to local people.

 

You should ensure your entry provides sufficient detail on all six criteria.

 

Projects in this category must have been completed between 1 July 2023 and 1 July 2025.

 

Shortlisted projects in this category will be judged by face to face presentations from our judging panel.

Submission details (max 1,300 words)

  • A precis version of the full name of the project as it may appear in Awards marketing material (no more than 5 words)
  • The full and proper name of the project and a brief description of what the project is with a focus on the outcome (100 words max)
  • A fuller written description of the key reason/s why this project should be considered for this award, which pays attention to all six criteria being assessed. You can address each in turn or cover them all off collectively. Please remember to give clear reasoning with quantitative and qualitative evidence (where possible) as to why this project is deserving of award (max 1,200 words)

 

Please ensure you read and adhere to the requirements set out below in order for your entry to be accepted.

 

Entry Requirements

  • Project must have been completed between 1 July 2023 and 1 July 2025
  • Maximum 1 page Layout plans – A4
  • Maximum 3 images with no annotation or logos added

 

All entries to be submitted electronically as a pdf only – All images and drawings must be submitted as separate files either as (A4 sized) jpegs or pdfs.

The best small project, to the final out-turn cost of £15M or less. All projects shortlisted in their category are eligible for this award, which will be judged by lead judges from each category represented on the shortlist.
This item is not available

Biggest Impact 

This category seeks to recognise project teams that understand the importance of creating a safe and healthy working environment and strive to improve wellbeing of those delivering the work. Judges will be particularly keen to see examples of initiatives that tackle mental health. Judges will be looking for project teams that have:

  • Demonstrated a clear understanding of how this initiative could improve health, safety and wellbeing performance on this project
  • Actively rolled out the initiative, developed or tailored specifically for this project during the design or delivery phase
  • Clear evidence of the impact of this initiative
  • Demonstrated how their initiative is cutting edge and is leading the field in this area
  • The potential to showcase the UK construction industry through this initiative

The project/s this initiative is being deployed on does not have to be complete; what is required is evidence that the project is tackling the specific initiative in a new and innovative way and that its positive impact can be measured or quantified.
£ 0.00
You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Shortlisted candidates will be interviewed by a panel of our judges, selected for their expertise in this area.

Submission details (max 1,100 words)

  • A precis version of the full name of the initiative and the project it has been applied on as it may appear in Awards marketing material (no more than eight words)
  • The full and proper name of the initiative and the project it has been applied on, and a brief description of what the initiative is, with a focus on the impact (100 words max)
  • A fuller written description of the key reason why this initiative should be considered for this award, which pays attention to as many of the criteria listed above as is appropriate. Please remember to give clear reasoning and evidence as to why this initiative is exceptional (max 1,000 words)

This category recognises the best examples of driving the use of smart technologies in construction to improve design, delivery or safety.

Digital solutions used in the right way have the potential to improve project efficiency at every stage and to allow engineers to focus their skills on the more technical challenging aspects of scheme. However, understanding why a solution is adopted over another, benchmarking its use to demonstrate success and look for continued improvements is critical to ensure technology allows engineers to work smarter. Judges will look for project teams that have:

  • Demonstrated a clear understanding of how this initiative could improve design or delivery of this project
  • Actively rolled out the initiative, developed or tailored specifically for this project during the design or delivery phase
  • Clear evidence of the impact of this initiative compared to previous practices, particularly if the initiative delivers carbon reduction or improved climate resilience
  • Demonstrated how their initiative is cutting edge and is leading the field in this area
  • The potential to showcase the UK construction industry through this initiative

The project/s this initiative is being used on does not have to be complete; what is required is evidence that the project is tackling the specific initiative in a new and innovative way and that its positive impact can be measured or quantified.
£ 0.00
You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Shortlisted candidates will be interviewed by a panel of our judges, selected for their expertise in this area.

Submission details (max 1,100 words)

  • A precis version of the full name of the initiative and the project it has been applied on as it may appear in Awards marketing material (no more than eight words)
  • The full and proper name of the initiative and the project it has been applied on, and a brief description of what the initiative is, with a focus on the impact (100 words max)
  • A fuller written description of the key reason why this initiative should be considered for this award, which pays attention to as many of the criteria listed above as is appropriate. Please remember to give clear reasoning and evidence as to why this initiative is exceptional (max 1,000 words)

This category will recognise the best examples of leading the field with reducing embodied carbon through the design, or construction of new infrastructure or buildings to support the government’s target to be carbon net zero by 2050. The initiative could be an alternative design, use of new materials or innovative equipment to reduce energy consumption during the project. Judges will be looking for:

  • Demonstration of how the solution presents a reduction in embodied carbon compared to the conventional approach. Recognition of the impact of the design on reducing operational carbon should also be demonstrated where possible.
  • Impact of the work to improve climate resilience of the work should also be demonstrated
  • Highlighted any innovations in design or execution, including any research strategy that led to the development carbon reducing solution.
  • Clear evidence of the qualitative and quantitative impact of this initiative
  • Demonstrate how the initiative is cutting edge and is leading the field in this area
  • The potential to showcase the UK construction industry through this initiative

The project does not have to be complete; what is required is evidence that the lower or zero carbon resulting from the new approach can be measured or quantified.
£ 0.00
You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Because projects may not be complete, shortlisted candidates will be interviewed by a panel of our judges, selected for their expertise in this area.

Submission details (max 1,100 words)

  • A precis version of the full name of the initiative and the project it has been applied on as it may appear in Awards marketing material (no more than eight words)
  • The full and proper name of the initiative and the project it has been applied on, and a brief description of what the initiative is, with a focus on the impact (100 words max)
  • A fuller written description of the key reason why this initiative should be considered for this award, which pays attention to as many of the criteria listed above as is appropriate. Please remember to give clear reasoning and evidence as to why this initiative is exceptional (max 1,000 words)

This award seeks to recognise project teams that have introduced a specific project-based initiative targeting a lower carbon solution, specifically boosting the whole life sustainability of the project or is improving environmental sensitivity. Judges will look for project teams that have:

  • Demonstrated a clear understanding of how this initiative could improve environmental or sustainability performance on this project
  • Demonstrate how the work will add climate resilience or deliver carbon reduction (embodied or operational) to the completed project
  • Actively rolled out the initiative, developed or tailored specifically for this project during the design or delivery phase
  • Clear evidence of the impact of this initiative
  • Demonstrated how their initiative is cutting edge and is leading the field in this area
  • The potential to showcase the UK construction industry through this initiative

The project/s this initiative is being applied on does not have to be complete; what is required is evidence that the project is tackling the specific initiative in a new and innovative way and that its positive impact can be measured or quantified.
£ 0.00
You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Shortlisted candidates will be interviewed by a panel of our judges, selected for their expertise in this area.

Submission details (max 1,100 words)

  • A precis version of the full name of the initiative and the project it has been applied on as it may appear in Awards marketing material (no more than eight words)
  • The full and proper name of the initiative and the project it has been applied on, and a brief description of what the initiative is, with a focus on the impact (100 words max)
  • A fuller written description of the key reason why this initiative should be considered for this award, which pays attention to as many of the criteria listed above as is appropriate. Please remember to give clear reasoning and evidence as to why this initiative is exceptional (max 1,000 words)

This category recognises the best examples of generating social value and community impact - improving the lives and prospects of the communities that live close to the project area.

We will be looking for project teams that can demonstrate an understanding and recognition of the importance of working with local communities and of the social impact their work can generate. These teams will have gone the extra mile to have not just sought to mitigate the impact of construction but to provide true outreach and social impact. Judges will look for project teams that have:

  • Demonstrated a clear understanding of the community’s needs and how these could be supported
  • Delivered real social value as a result of the project to improve the quality of life of those living close to the project
  • Actively rolled out an initiative developed specifically for this community
  • Clear evidence of the impact of this initiative
  • Demonstrated how their initiative is cutting edge and is leading the field in this area
  • The potential to showcase the UK construction industry through this initiative

The project/s this initiative is being applied on does not need to be complete; what is required is evidence that the project is tackling the specific initiative in a new and innovative way and that its positive impact can be measured or quantified.
£ 0.00
You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Shortlisted candidates will be interviewed by a panel of our judges, selected for their expertise in this area.

Submission details (max 1,100 words)

  • A precis version of the full name of the initiative and the project it has been applied on as it may appear in Awards marketing material (no more than eight words)
  • The full and proper name of the initiative and the project it has been applied on, and a brief description of what the initiative is, with a focus on the impact (100 words max)
  • A fuller written description of the key reason why this initiative should be considered for this award, which pays attention to as many of the criteria listed above as is appropriate. Please remember to give clear reasoning and evidence as to why this initiative is exceptional (max 1,000 words)

This category recognises an innovation in products for design or construction that are deployed on specific projects and that are boosting overall project outcomes. Judges will look for project teams that have:

  • Demonstrated a clear understanding of the project outcomes and saw how this innovation could improve design or delivery of this project
  • Actively rolled out the initiative, developed or tailored specifically for this project during the design or delivery phase
  • Clear evidence of the impact of this initiative, particularly if the innovation delivers carbon reduction or improved climate resilience
  • Demonstrated how their initiative is cutting edge and is leading the field in this area
  • The potential to showcase the UK construction industry through this initiative

 

Innovations developed or manufactured in the UK by overseas companies are permitted, as are products researched and developed in the UK, but manufactured overseas.

The projects this innovation is being used on does not have to be complete.
£ 0.00
You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Shortlisted candidates will be interviewed by a panel of our judges, selected for their expertise in this area.

Submission details (max 1,100 words)

  • A precis version of the full name of the innovation and the project it has been applied on as it may appear in Awards marketing material (no more than eight words)
  • The full and proper name of the innovation and the project it has been applied on, and a brief description of what the initiative is, with a focus on the impact (100 words max)
  • A fuller written description of the key reason why this initiative should be considered for this award, which pays attention to as many of the criteria listed above as is appropriate. Please remember to give clear reasoning and evidence as to why this initiative is exceptional (max 1,000 words)

Design & Delivery 

This category recognises the best examples of pushing the boundaries of architectural innovation, combining creativity with practical functionality to enhance the built environment.

Judges will look for teams that have excelled with:

  • A visionary approach to design
  • An exceptional solution that meet project needs
  • Consideration of sustainability, aesthetics, and user experience.
  • Teams should also illustrate how their work positively contribute to project success and its wider impact.
£ 0.00
You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Shortlisted candidates will be interviewed by a panel of our judges, selected for their expertise in this area.

Submission details (max 1,100 words)

  • A precis version of the full name of the project the entry refers to (no more than eight words)
  • A brief description of entry highlights, with a focus on the impact (100 words max)
  • A fuller written description of the key reason why you should be considered for this award, which pays attention to as many of the criteria listed above as is appropriate. Please remember to give clear reasoning and evidence as to why this organisation is exceptional (max 1,000 words)

This category recognises the best examples of main contractors pushing the boundaries of great delivery through exceptional skill, innovation, and dedication in delivering high-quality construction projects.

Judges will look for teams that have showcased:

  • Outstanding project management
  • Technical expertise
  • Embracing of innovation, technologies and practices that enhance delivery outcomes.
  • Collaboration to improve project delivery, overcome challenges and achieve exemplary results.
  • Entries should also highlight how their work has set new benchmarks for efficiency, safety, and overall project success.
£ 0.00
You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Shortlisted candidates will be interviewed by a panel of our judges, selected for their expertise in this area.

Submission details (max 1,100 words)

  • A precis version of the full name of the project the entry refers to (no more than eight words)
  • A brief description of entry highlights, with a focus on the impact (100 words max)
  • A fuller written description of the key reason why you should be considered for this award, which pays attention to as many of the criteria listed above as is appropriate. Please remember to give clear reasoning and evidence as to why this organisation is exceptional (max 1,000 words)

This category recognises the best examples of pushing the boundaries of engineering design and delivery, demonstrating outstanding innovation, precision, and problem-solving in delivering exceptional project outcomes.

Judges will look for teams that have showcased:

  • Cutting-edge engineering design, practice and solutions,
  • Exemplary technical expertise applied to enhance real-world outcomes
  • A commitment to quality and efficiency, sustainability and social impact
  • Entries should also highlight how these achievements have contributed project success and set new standards in the industry.
£ 0.00
You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Shortlisted candidates will be interviewed by a panel of our judges, selected for their expertise in this area.

Submission details (max 1,100 words)

  • A precis version of the full name of the project the entry refers to (no more than eight words)
  • A brief description of entry highlights, with a focus on the impact (100 words max)
  • A fuller written description of the key reason why you should be considered for this award, which pays attention to as many of the criteria listed above as is appropriate. Please remember to give clear reasoning and evidence as to why this organisation is exceptional (max 1,000 words)

This category recognises the best examples of exceptional collaboration, leadership, and commitment to delivering outstanding results.

Judges will look for teams that have:

  • Successfully navigated challenges together
  • Fostered a culture of innovation and teamwork with tangible results
  • Adopted best practices and processes for collaboration across projects and programmes.
  • Exceeded expectations in achieving project goals.
  • Entries should highlight how the team’s collective effort and synergy contributed to the overall success of a project.
£ 0.00
You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Shortlisted candidates will be interviewed by a panel of our judges, selected for their expertise in this area.

Submission details (max 1,100 words)

  • A precis version of the full name of the project the entry refers to (no more than eight words)
  • A brief descriptThis category recognises the best examples of pushing the boundaries of ion of entry highlights, with a focus on the impact (100 words max)
  • A fuller written description of the key reason why you should be considered for this award, which pays attention to as many of the criteria listed above as is appropriate. Please remember to give clear reasoning and evidence as to why this organisation is exceptional (max 1,000 words)